Comments on: Travers pushes NQ lawyer pay to £120k https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/travers-pushes-nq-lawyer-pay-to-120k/ Legal news, insider insight and careers advice Wed, 17 Jul 2024 15:48:00 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6 By: J the chemist https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/travers-pushes-nq-lawyer-pay-to-120k/#comment-1195802 Wed, 17 Jul 2024 15:48:00 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=207021#comment-1195802 In reply to Chris.

Slaughters does have high PEP (but also has a tiny partnership) and doesn’t operate in less profitable markets (Europe & Asia for example) which eats into PEP of the other MC firms (and the likes of Herbies, Ashursts)

Slaughters does get elite public M&A mandates no doubt in the UK, but globally, no. It’s not exactly Skadden, STB and so on.

Maybe an Electrum Circle and Slaughters is its only member.

]]>
By: McDentons https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/travers-pushes-nq-lawyer-pay-to-120k/#comment-1195799 Wed, 17 Jul 2024 15:30:28 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=207021#comment-1195799 In reply to Dentons.

Do you want fries with that?

]]>
By: Anon https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/travers-pushes-nq-lawyer-pay-to-120k/#comment-1195776 Wed, 17 Jul 2024 12:21:04 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=207021#comment-1195776 In reply to Bryan Caved.

I.e., they are not SC.

]]>
By: ES https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/travers-pushes-nq-lawyer-pay-to-120k/#comment-1195764 Wed, 17 Jul 2024 09:53:15 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=207021#comment-1195764 In reply to Dd.

Eversheds is 100k NQ.

]]>
By: Dentons https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/travers-pushes-nq-lawyer-pay-to-120k/#comment-1195762 Wed, 17 Jul 2024 09:23:36 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=207021#comment-1195762 In reply to C.

Clearly dont work at Dentons then

]]>
By: Chris https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/travers-pushes-nq-lawyer-pay-to-120k/#comment-1195761 Wed, 17 Jul 2024 08:49:04 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=207021#comment-1195761 In reply to The List Blesser.

Slaughters is not Silver Circle. It needs a new category. Given its profitability (much higher than MC) and elite mandates, should it be Platinum Circle?

]]>
By: lolol https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/travers-pushes-nq-lawyer-pay-to-120k/#comment-1195738 Wed, 17 Jul 2024 00:40:51 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=207021#comment-1195738 In reply to lol.

Why should they raise it? Slaughters are a full service SC firm that pays just about right for what they are

]]>
By: C https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/travers-pushes-nq-lawyer-pay-to-120k/#comment-1195723 Tue, 16 Jul 2024 19:54:42 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=207021#comment-1195723 Dentons to £125k in early 2025

]]>
By: Dd https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/travers-pushes-nq-lawyer-pay-to-120k/#comment-1195722 Tue, 16 Jul 2024 19:54:02 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=207021#comment-1195722 She’d rising to £110k

]]>
By: Truth https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/travers-pushes-nq-lawyer-pay-to-120k/#comment-1195721 Tue, 16 Jul 2024 19:52:11 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=207021#comment-1195721 Just cos a firm has a higher salary don’t necessarily make them better than another firm

]]>
By: Pedantphile Hunter https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/travers-pushes-nq-lawyer-pay-to-120k/#comment-1195703 Tue, 16 Jul 2024 13:22:13 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=207021#comment-1195703 In reply to Make sense.

If you’re being pedantic, sure, the overarching question is the same. But there’s clearly a distinction between whether BCLP formed part of the SC two decades ago, i.e., did they originally belong, and whether they currently deserve to be ‘de-grouped’, seeing as many have long deemed them a SC-firm anyway, despite the historical contention.

]]>
By: Plopped https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/travers-pushes-nq-lawyer-pay-to-120k/#comment-1195689 Tue, 16 Jul 2024 11:12:56 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=207021#comment-1195689 In reply to salaryraisefortheebutnotforme.

Who?

]]>
By: Bryan Caved https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/travers-pushes-nq-lawyer-pay-to-120k/#comment-1195686 Tue, 16 Jul 2024 10:41:19 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=207021#comment-1195686 In reply to ?.

BCLP is SC for real estate, and CMS/Shed/Pinsent etc. level for everything else lol

]]>
By: Make sense https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/travers-pushes-nq-lawyer-pay-to-120k/#comment-1195685 Tue, 16 Jul 2024 10:35:40 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=207021#comment-1195685 In reply to ?.

No it’s very much the same question. Don’t let platitudes get in the way of making a point.

]]>
By: King Arthur https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/travers-pushes-nq-lawyer-pay-to-120k/#comment-1195682 Tue, 16 Jul 2024 10:24:41 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=207021#comment-1195682 In reply to The List Blesser.

Agreed – Ashurst, Travers Smith, Herbert Smith and Macfarlanes were the traditional Silver Circle.

Ashurst and HSF are legacy Silver Circle firms, now in a different grouping, with SM joining the Silver Circle. Quite the full circle considering SM is the “child” of Ashurst Morris Crisp.

]]>
By: ? https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/travers-pushes-nq-lawyer-pay-to-120k/#comment-1195679 Tue, 16 Jul 2024 10:10:09 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=207021#comment-1195679 In reply to Hierarchy.

Yes, they’re obviously still SC, it’s firms like BCLP that are questionable (whether they’ve ever been fully in the bucket is another question altogether)

]]>
By: The List Blesser https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/travers-pushes-nq-lawyer-pay-to-120k/#comment-1195678 Tue, 16 Jul 2024 10:04:34 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=207021#comment-1195678 In reply to Hierarchy.

The SC has fragmented like the MC:

Traditional SC (based on the original criteria): Macfarlanes, Travers (hanging on) and now Slaughter and May.
SC firms that have global “elite” ambitions (and no longer fit the SC criteria): Ashurst and HSF
Defunct: BLP
No one seriously considers SC: Mishcon, CMS etc.

]]>
By: Hierarchy https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/travers-pushes-nq-lawyer-pay-to-120k/#comment-1195676 Tue, 16 Jul 2024 09:44:18 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=207021#comment-1195676 Is Travers still considered SC? What’s the agreed-upon list?

]]>
By: Anonymous https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/travers-pushes-nq-lawyer-pay-to-120k/#comment-1195675 Tue, 16 Jul 2024 09:31:25 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=207021#comment-1195675 In reply to Piggy Bank.

Traver’s HR team rally with the downvotes

]]>
By: salaryraisefortheebutnotforme https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/travers-pushes-nq-lawyer-pay-to-120k/#comment-1195674 Tue, 16 Jul 2024 09:29:00 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=207021#comment-1195674 Any word from Jones Day, Morgan Lewis, Orrick, Cooley etc etc?

]]>
By: But also not bad https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/travers-pushes-nq-lawyer-pay-to-120k/#comment-1195670 Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:50:26 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=207021#comment-1195670 In reply to Not great.

Eh, sort of, they’ve been a bit below HSF, HogLov and Macs for the last few review rounds anyway. A 9% raise in the current market isn’t awful. Doubt anyone is losing sleep over it!

]]>