Comments on: BCLP posts 58% trainee retention rate https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/bclp-posts-58-trainee-retention-rate/ Legal news, insider insight and careers advice Mon, 08 Jul 2024 19:34:21 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6 By: Bclp insider https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/bclp-posts-58-trainee-retention-rate/#comment-1195056 Mon, 08 Jul 2024 19:34:21 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206751#comment-1195056 In reply to Stu.

They had a 29% retention rate in spring. You can’t blame BLP’s decline purely on the current market.

]]>
By: NQ https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/bclp-posts-58-trainee-retention-rate/#comment-1195054 Mon, 08 Jul 2024 19:08:56 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206751#comment-1195054 This is dreadful. BCLP was never a serious player in any field, other than RE.

Bleeding partners, associates and now, trainees, across the board.

]]>
By: Rosie https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/bclp-posts-58-trainee-retention-rate/#comment-1195045 Mon, 08 Jul 2024 15:23:07 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206751#comment-1195045 In reply to Stu.

It still is a strong London firm. The NQ market is just dead and firms aren’t looking to hire

]]>
By: Jay https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/bclp-posts-58-trainee-retention-rate/#comment-1195044 Mon, 08 Jul 2024 15:21:32 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206751#comment-1195044 In reply to Un-retained elite US trained.

For external NQ roles? Nah bro it’s much higher than that.

There are over a hundred applicants going per NQ role.

It’s a VERY saturated market.

]]>
By: Truth Serum https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/bclp-posts-58-trainee-retention-rate/#comment-1195043 Mon, 08 Jul 2024 15:18:25 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206751#comment-1195043 In reply to Stu.

It’s not about how strong a firm is.

The market is dead and there’s nothing firms can do about that.

Trainees at US firms and Magic Circle / Silver Circle firms are being let go.

The firms that are disclosing higher retention are not telling you the whole truth. A lot of trainees are having to qualify into teams they did not want to for the sake of having a job.

]]>
By: Kirkland NQ https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/bclp-posts-58-trainee-retention-rate/#comment-1195042 Mon, 08 Jul 2024 14:21:45 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206751#comment-1195042 In reply to Unretained Silver Circle Trainee.

Sorry, can you speak up, can’t hear you over the sound of my Lambo.

]]>
By: Un-retained elite US trained https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/bclp-posts-58-trainee-retention-rate/#comment-1195040 Mon, 08 Jul 2024 14:02:47 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206751#comment-1195040 In reply to Unretained Silver Circle Trainee.

So true. 30-40 trainees fighting for 1 NQ role.

]]>
By: Curious https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/bclp-posts-58-trainee-retention-rate/#comment-1195039 Mon, 08 Jul 2024 13:54:10 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206751#comment-1195039 In reply to Greg.

Where’s he taking it?

]]>
By: Stu https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/bclp-posts-58-trainee-retention-rate/#comment-1195035 Mon, 08 Jul 2024 13:40:23 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206751#comment-1195035 Wow. Genuinely shocked reading that headline. What on earth is going on? Berwin Leighton Paisner was historically an incredibly strong London firm of solicitors?

]]>
By: To the commenter above (pick any) https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/bclp-posts-58-trainee-retention-rate/#comment-1195033 Mon, 08 Jul 2024 12:09:00 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206751#comment-1195033 Hey you shut up!

]]>
By: Frank https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/bclp-posts-58-trainee-retention-rate/#comment-1195031 Mon, 08 Jul 2024 11:57:54 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206751#comment-1195031 In reply to Reply to smart ass.

This may be hands down the dumbest comment I’ve read in a long looong time.

]]>
By: Ed https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/bclp-posts-58-trainee-retention-rate/#comment-1195030 Mon, 08 Jul 2024 11:57:12 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206751#comment-1195030 In reply to Hmm.

There is zero correlation between retention and NQ salaries.

Hope that helps

]]>
By: Greg https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/bclp-posts-58-trainee-retention-rate/#comment-1195029 Mon, 08 Jul 2024 11:55:15 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206751#comment-1195029 You’re taking out your arse mate

]]>
By: Reply to idiot https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/bclp-posts-58-trainee-retention-rate/#comment-1195028 Mon, 08 Jul 2024 11:53:40 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206751#comment-1195028 In reply to Reply to smart ass.

Nothing you said makes any sense. You’re just spouting complete nonsense.

Clearly you don’t understand ecenomics or finance or more importantly how law firms operate as a business.

“increasing NQ salaries when retention rates are low may not align with financial prudence” … wth are you on about here???? Some of these law firms with low nq retention rates are posting their best ever financial end of year. They can afford to increase the NQ salaries – they simply aren’t taking on more NQs because there isn’t a demand for NQs in the current market. Many of these teams are looking for 2-5PQEs not NQs.

“It could lead to higher costs”… wrong again! If firms aren’t taking on as many NQs but increasing the NQ salaries then it doesn’t lead to higher costs. It’s simple maths. Paying 50 NQs 100,000 or 30NQs 110,000… which works out cheaper? Exactly.

“without clear evidence that higher salaries will improve retention and productivity”… you don’t need evidence to prove that a pay increase will incentivise people to stay.

You are an absolute waffler who knows nothing.

]]>
By: Reply to smart ass https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/bclp-posts-58-trainee-retention-rate/#comment-1195026 Mon, 08 Jul 2024 11:09:01 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206751#comment-1195026 Erm genius I know that but increasing NQ salaries when retention rates are low may not align with financial prudence. It could lead to higher costs without guaranteeing long-term retention or productivity gains.

Also without clear evidence that higher salaries will improve retention and productivity, the investment in increased NQ salaries may not yield sufficient returns to justify the expenditure.

]]>
By: Unretained Silver Circle Trainee https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/bclp-posts-58-trainee-retention-rate/#comment-1195023 Mon, 08 Jul 2024 10:34:12 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206751#comment-1195023 Retention is poor across the board at city firms.

The NQ market is dead.

Budget cuts in departments.

Good luck to trainees qualifying this September!

I feel for you.

]]>
By: Are you thick? https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/bclp-posts-58-trainee-retention-rate/#comment-1195021 Mon, 08 Jul 2024 10:25:29 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206751#comment-1195021 In reply to Hmm.

NQ salary increases aren’t purely aimed at NQs lmao.

]]>
By: Hmm https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/bclp-posts-58-trainee-retention-rate/#comment-1195020 Mon, 08 Jul 2024 08:48:52 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206751#comment-1195020 Yet they increased their NQ salaries

]]>