PostsNews

Macfarlanes enters City pay war, boosts NQ lawyer salaries over 20% to £140k

Avatar photo

By Legal Cheek on

51

Also confirms 84% retention score


City law firm Macfarlanes has increased the salaries of its newly qualified (NQ) lawyers by 22%, raising them from £115,000 to £140,000.

The outfit has also upped trainee pay from £50,000 to £56,000 in year one and £55,000 to £61,000 in year two.

The Legal Cheek Firms Most List shows that the NQ rise brings Macs in line with US firm Orrick and £5,000 ahead of Hogan Lovells, which increased its rates from £120,000 to £135,000 earlier this month.

The 2024 Legal Cheek Firms Most List

Separately, Macfarlanes confirmed a retention rate of 84%, with 27 out of 32 final-seat trainees staying on. All of them are joining on permanent contracts.

Jat Bains, early legal careers partner, said: “We are excited to welcome our September qualifiers across a range of practice areas and congratulations to this talented cohort. We are proud to invest in our trainees so that their careers can thrive at Macfarlanes.”

Catherine Morgan-Guest, early legal careers senior manager, added: “We are committed to providing exceptional training and support to further the careers of the diverse group of talent we recruit. They are intrinsic to what we do and the future of our firm.”

51 Comments

Slaughters

We know people are asking – but our associates are getting by splendidly on our prestige & multi-specialism fare!

Reply Report comment
(131)(1)

Rupert; 🇺🇸 💸

Chicken feed, dear being or entity.

Reply Report comment
(1)(3)

Incoming trainee

Any update on them “considering” pay?

Reply Report comment
(2)(0)

SM Assoc

Doesn’t apply to you lol, it will be different by the time you get here, and you might not even stay on past your TC (low retention this year…)

Reply Report comment
(16)(0)

MC associate

Didn’t they retain 95% of their trainees this year?

Reply Report comment
(0)(0)

Kirkland NQ

Haha, they are bringing a knife to a gunfight here if this is “entering the City pay war”

Reply Report comment
(16)(59)

Concerned mid level associate

Any news from senior Macfarlanes people – is there much/any bunching or have they increased each PQE’s salary by a similar % / figure?

Reply Report comment
(16)(0)

Nq

25 uplift at each PQE

Reply Report comment
(22)(25)

Concerned associate

Four thumbs up and four down, is this true or not??

Reply Report comment
(0)(10)

Greg

We’re told individually and it won’t happen until tomorrow.

Reply Report comment
(17)(0)

Enlightened associate

True

Reply Report comment
(9)(0)

East London Associate

Whew… massive move from Macfarlanes – I have to rate it. I wonder whether that’ll prompt some of the US firms who hover around the 140-150K to move e.g. Jones Day, Dechert and White and Case. Particularly Jones Day and Dechert haven’t moved NQ salaries for a while now (both about 2 years if I’m correct). If I was a law grad, at this point it’d make the most sense to go for the magic circle or a Macfarlanes over a Jones Day or Dechert who have essentially excluded themselves from the market (being non-Cravath US, and paying lower than the UK firms).

Reply Report comment
(60)(3)

US future trainee

I’d sooner work for free than for JD or Dechert anyway

Reply Report comment
(59)(4)

Anon

JD Sports

Reply Report comment
(32)(0)

I thought americans were savvy with it

It boggles the mind. Those non-elite US firms were already paying £140-150k when the Magic Circle were paying £110k. That’s the reason people went there. They’ve just let themselves be caught over the last two years and there’s little to no argument why you’d now choose Dechert over MC or increasingly the SC.

Reply Report comment
(34)(2)

Lawyer

Most of the US firms pay Cravath scale (eg £178k NQ depending on the exchange rate).

Legal cheek is just not up to date with their figures for a lot of the US Firms.

Reply Report comment
(7)(4)

"Lawyer", or are you a "Law Student"?

“Most US firms pay Cravath scale”… written like a true law student? There are quite a few US firms who clearly don’t pay cravath in London. That’s just basic knowledge and for any associate who has ever worked in one of those non-Cravath paying US firms in London (as I have done previously), you know that a massive point of contention among London associates is always the differential in first year US associate and NQ UK salaries.

I can’t speak for every US firm, but knowing current associates at both JD and Dechert those NQ salaries are definitely up to date. So the point about them having lost their market position seems a valid one… At this point why train at a non-Cravath paying US firm in London, when you could go MC (or even SC).

Dechert not moving hasn’t suprised me because of their litigation issues with their former White Collar head (City AM reported earlier this year how much they’d had to pay out so far which was eye watering) and I’ve heard both JD and Dechert have had issues with deal flow in certain practices (Corporate etc).

Reply Report comment
(17)(0)

Non-Cravath US Trainee

White & Case, Cooley, Dechert, Jones Day, Covington, and my firm are just a handful of US firms in London still paying £140-150k.

It’s fair to say that, for most people, the MC is more attractive than these firms at the same price-point.

I hope they raise quickly or I’m going to start regretting my decision.

Reply Report comment
(14)(1)

Hopeful trainee

Any insights into Bakers upping NQ salaries?

Reply Report comment
(6)(11)

Trader

I don’t think Bakers all have the same baseline salary, nor do Butchers or Fishmongers

Reply Report comment
(50)(1)

Anon

New financial year starts in July. Promotions just announced. Salaries to follow next week.

Reply Report comment
(2)(0)

nq fanatic

do u know the salary increases?

Reply Report comment
(2)(0)

Avon

Well-timed, long-waited rises for the associates, though at the very painful cost of losing associates to US counterparts on six figure pay rises.

Reply Report comment
(35)(0)

HSF associate

All quiet at HSF. Rather disappointing!

Reply Report comment
(36)(2)

HSF associate

News on Monday apparently

Reply Report comment
(36)(2)

who’s next

Who’s rising next that non MC/SC/US ?

Reply Report comment
(7)(0)

Failure is not an option

Would have to pay 200k base to put up with that lot

Reply Report comment
(9)(20)

The Hopeful, the doubtful

Travers Smith, any news?

Reply Report comment
(9)(0)

Disgruntled and tired

This is so embarrassing for Hogan Lovells !!!!

Reply Report comment
(39)(6)

Anon

Why though? Macs has always been more profitable. HogLove is doing great

Reply Report comment
(17)(3)

Keen observer

A previous commenter on another post said that Macfarlanes is ‘stuck in the past’ but offered no explanation. Wondering what people’s thoughts are on this.

Reply Report comment
(11)(0)

Alan

If it’s stuck in the past it’s stuck in a very pleasant past. Less diversity stuff, very hierarchical (a good thing), much more limited geographical footprint.

Reply Report comment
(21)(21)

Anon

Less diversity … that’s not a good thing and actually the firm is trying to address it. It does feel like a private school + Oxbridge club sometimes at Macs but I have never witnessed anything toxic – most people are decent.

Hierarchical – agreed that it is a good thing when it comes to clear directions from management & co – there are no bad surprises at Macs.

Geographical footprint – agree this worked well for us as being the random outlier helps when getting referrals from similar firms in the US and the EU or even from the MC when they are conflicted. That said, the market for such firms is very limited in the City and most City firms were right to become global / international. Hard to see how Freshfields or, in another category, DLA could be criticised for that approach. As to culture, this does not make much of a difference IMO, although it is true that there are only a few associates from outside the UK (never mind partners), which feels a bit odd for an international law firm (the work/clients are international).

Reply Report comment
(7)(0)

Anonymous

Agreed – I did a Vac Scheme there this year. Still felt very Old Boys Club. Case in point – a very hard working trainee (who happened to be a PoC) was teased and made fun of for being ‘anti-social’.

The bully – another trainee who apparently was shagging his way through the trainee cohort – had no reprimands against him for this and seemed to be in the managing partners’ good books, despite doing half the work.

Not saying it doesn’t happen in other firms but from my experience (and compared to other vac schemes at other firms) there was a much more toxic air to the place.

Reply Report comment
(14)(28)

CMS Trainee

I beg, CMS you making us look bad. Ki

Reply Report comment
(11)(1)

Dentons

Relax yourself. We are £10k behind you.

Reply Report comment
(4)(0)

CMS Associate

Could be worse, you could be an associate.

Reply Report comment
(16)(0)

Anon

Surprised AG haven’t announced anything yet seeing as they’re doing so well

Reply Report comment
(15)(0)

Ds

Stephenson, She’d, Watsons, AG – look at your age mates, move a needle or something

Reply Report comment
(4)(0)

Lol

Seen on ROF:
“ You love to see it. Hopefully the US stragglers at the £140-150k mark will soon increase. Then the rest of the silver circle will join Hogan Lovells and Macs. Maybe one day we can even dream that CMS, Addleshaw, Dentons and the Shed will stop their NQs claiming universal credit. One can dream”

Reply Report comment
(11)(1)

That comment made me chuckle

Loool “universal credit” wannabe and actual lawyers are so out of touch it’s ridiculous 😂😂

Reply Report comment
(1)(1)

Hog 'lols'

Leapfrogging HogLovs is a great move.

Reply Report comment
(15)(1)

Hi Slaughter and May

Can you please not stall the pay war for a year this time. Cheers

Reply Report comment
(7)(0)

Trainee

Bakers? 🙏 Come on, you know you want to…

Reply Report comment
(3)(3)

Astigmatism 9000

W&C please… stop being mid it’s not funny anymore

Reply Report comment
(9)(1)

Pants before socks that’s the rule. Never socks before pants: makes a man look scary, like a chicken.

A few weeks ago people were saying in the MC / US firm salary increase comments that it won’t trickle down to lower firms.

Absolutely malarkey

Reply Report comment
(7)(0)

Anon

Interesting time for Baker. If they dont match those level, they would fall below silver circle firms. Basically DLA at this point

Reply Report comment
(4)(0)

Interested

Has bakers historically paid more than SC and MC? I know they’re nominally US but has pay previously reflected that?

Reply Report comment
(4)(0)

Anon

Baker used to pay more than most sc firms but less than most mc firms before this years increase. Not sure if they can match that now

Reply Report comment
(3)(0)

Google This

Bakers raising to £140k in next 1-2 weeks. Awaiting partner sign-off

Reply Report comment
(1)(0)

Cc

es and ag will probs move to 100k and maybe Dentons too

Reply Report comment
(0)(1)

Join the conversation

Related Stories

news

Sidley increases NQ associate salaries to £175,000 in London

Rises for rookies too

Jun 14 2024 8:46am
29
news

RPC raises NQ lawyer pay to £90k for London commercial team, keeps insurance salaries at £80k

Boosts for some

Jun 13 2024 12:35pm
29
news

Hogan Lovells enters pay war, boosting NQ lawyer salaries to £135k in London and £85k in Birmingham

More rises

Jun 11 2024 4:12pm
51